- Since the beginning of the industrial era, the 1°C increase in temperature that has been observed has not been a fundamental factor in changing the climates of the world's populated areas.
- It is a fact that human industry contributes to the increase in temperature, but a large part of it cannot be attributed to so-called greenhouse gases.
- We live in different climates, subject to great differences in temperature and precipitation.
Seasonal changes in weather conditions or catastrophic events cannot and should not be interpreted as indicators of climate change; such an attitude is irresponsible, unsupported by recent observations and trends.
- Climates deserve to be studied; since they change very slowly, it will take a very long time, centuries, because unlike many other scientific research, we have only one experiment that is ongoing in a single laboratory, that of our planet Earth.
- Though, our impatience should not lead us to use feeble computer models, however complex, to determine how the climate is and should be.
Exaggerations led by unrealistic scenarios should not be used as a reference.
Such an approach is neither reasonable nor scientific and, so far, has not been validated. Fictions generated in silico have no place in political decisions.
- The urgent and massive implementation of decarbonation programmes is neither realistic nor socially acceptable.
87% of the world's primary energy supply is dependent on fossil fuels; this can't be reduced to a net zero iwithin 10 or even 30 years.
As the impact of CO2 on the climate is greatly exaggerated, restrictive policies will have only minor effects, while the social costs would be considerable.
- Apart from low altitude winter resorts that are too often deprived of snow, there are no known victims of climate change to date, even if the climatic conditions continue to do so.
Exaggerations, misinterpretations and lies about current and potential disasters are used to force the world towards global governance that has all the flavours of collectivism.
- History shows that humanity has adapted well to the changes before, during and after the last ice age.
There are also benefits that warming can offer; someare already apparent, such as the greening of the Sahel.
Why should this adaptability be ignored, regardless of the causes of the changes?
- We have time ahead of us to act reasonably.
It is urgent to reject calls for urgent and total mobilization on the pretext of a "climate crisis".
- "Climate urgency" has become a dogma. Such ideology worthy of the Inquisition must not be tolerated.
- But in governments, the media, industries and services, and NGOs, many bodies have now formed that live very well, too well, from these disastrous climate prophecies.
- A considerable amount of political courage has become necessary to change the course of this unfortunate and scandalous farce.
